Talis and I have been having a bit of a back-and-forth here on Substack. If you’d like to read our exchange, here are the articles:
Talis, 10/3: Moral Error Theory is Mistaken Because Genocide is Wrong
Me, 10/9: Do Error Theory and Subjectivism Entail Absurd and Unacceptable Results?
Talis, 10/13: Travis’ Tangle: A Response
Me, 10/14: Error Theory and Subjectivism Still Do Not Entail Absurd and Unacceptable Results
We decided to take the exchange from text to voice. In this video, we talk about whether Talis is guilty of normative entanglement, whether their arguments against error theory are examples of equivocation, what error theorists are committed to, subjectivism and moral obligations, whether subjectivists can legitimately criticize others, and subjectivism and moral disagreement: